What are the bioequivalence acceptance limits for AUC and Cmax (90% confidence interval)?
Bioequivalence & biowaivers · Acceptance limits (90% CI) (AUC · Cmax). Verbatim excerpts from each authority's document, with the section.
SFDA Saudi Food and Drug Authority
SFDA Guidelines for Bioequivalence v3.1 (DS-G-010)
In studies to determine bioequivalence after a single dose, the parameters to be analyzed are AUC(0-t), or, when relevant, AUC(0-72h), and Cmax. For these parameters the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the test and reference products should be contained within the acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00%.SFDA BE v3.1 · 3.1.8 Evaluation – Parameters to be analyzed and acceptance limits ↗
To be inside the acceptance interval the lower bound should be ≥ 80.00% when rounded to two decimal places and the upper bound should be ≤ 125.00% when rounded to two decimal places.SFDA BE v3.1 · 3.1.8 Evaluation – Parameters to be analyzed and acceptance limits ↗
For studies to determine bioequivalence of immediate release formulations at steady state, AUC(0-τ) and Cmax,ss should be analyzed using the same acceptance interval as stated above.SFDA BE v3.1 · 3.1.8 Evaluation – Parameters to be analyzed and acceptance limits ↗
EU European Union
ICH M13A · ICH M9 · EMA BE guideline
The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio of these PK parameters used to establish BE should lie within a range of 80.00 - 125.00%.ICH M13A · 2.2.4 ↗
The assessment of BE is based on 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (test/comparator) for the primary PK parameters under consideration.ICH M13A · 2.2.3.1 ↗
To be inside the acceptance interval the lower bound should be ≥ 80.00% when rounded to two decimal places and the upper bound should be ≤ 125.00% when rounded to two decimal places.EMA BE guideline · 4.1.8 ↗
US FDA US Food and Drug Administration
M13A · M9 · ANDA BE · statistics · 21 CFR 320
The assessment of BE is based on 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (test/comparator) for the primary PK parameters under consideration.FDA M13A · 2.2.3.1 ↗
For a broad range of drugs, a BE limit of 80.00 percent to 125.00 percent for the ratio of the product averages has been adopted for use of an average BE criterion.FDA Statistical Approaches 2026 · I.B, footnote 6 ↗
For unscaled average BE analyses, to pass a confidence interval limit of 80 to 125 percent, the rounded confidence interval value should be at least 80.00 percent and not more than 125.00.FDA ANDA BE 2026 · Appendix (Confidence interval values for unscaled average BE analyses) ↗
WHO World Health Organization
TRS 1052 Annex 8 (2024)
The 90% confidence interval for this measure of relative bioavailability should lie within a bioequivalence range of 80.00–125.00%.WHO TRS 1052 Annex 8 · 7.7 — AUC0–t ratio ↗
For maximal concentration data, the acceptance limit of 80.00–125.00% should be applied to the 90% confidence interval for the mean Cmax ratio.WHO TRS 1052 Annex 8 · 7.7 — Cmax ratio ↗
The same criterion applies to the parameter AUCτ in multiple-dose studies and for partial AUCs if they are necessary for comparative testing of a modified-release product.WHO TRS 1052 Annex 8 · 7.7 — AUC0–t ratio ↗
Other questions in Bioequivalence & biowaivers
- When is an in vivo bioequivalence study required?
- What is the standard bioequivalence study design?
- How many subjects, and which population, are required in a bioequivalence study?
- When are fasting and fed bioequivalence studies required?
- Which reference (comparator) product must be used in a bioequivalence study?
- Which strength must be tested in a bioequivalence study?
- What should be measured in a bioequivalence study: parent drug, metabolite or enantiomers?
- What bioequivalence acceptance limits apply to narrow therapeutic index drugs?
- How are bioequivalence acceptance limits widened for highly variable drugs?
- When can additional strengths be waived from bioequivalence testing?
- When is a BCS-based biowaiver accepted?
- How is dissolution profile similarity (f2) assessed?
Excerpts are selected for comparison and are not the whole requirement; the binding text is each authority's current official document. Not regulatory advice.