When are fasting and fed bioequivalence studies required?
Bioequivalence & biowaivers · Fasting vs fed studies. Verbatim excerpts from each authority's document, with the section.
SFDA Saudi Food and Drug Authority
SFDA Guidelines for Bioequivalence v3.1 (DS-G-010)
In general, a bioequivalence study should be conducted under fasting conditions as this is considered to be the most sensitive condition to detect a potential difference between formulations.SFDA BE v3.1 · 3.1.4 Study conduct – Fasting or fed conditions ↗
For products where the SPC recommends intake of the reference medicinal product on an empty stomach or irrespective of food intake, the bioequivalence study should hence be conducted under fasting conditions. For products where the SPC recommends intake of the reference medicinal product only in fed state, the bioequivalence study should generally be conducted under fed conditions.SFDA BE v3.1 · 3.1.4 Study conduct – Fasting or fed conditions ↗
However, for products with specific formulation characteristics (e.g. microemulsions, solid dispersions), bioequivalence studies performed under both fasted and fed conditions are required unless the product must be taken only in the fasted state or only in the fed state. For modified release product, bioequivalence studies performed under both fasted and fed conditions are required.SFDA BE v3.1 · 3.1.4 Study conduct – Fasting or fed conditions ↗
EU European Union
ICH M13A · ICH M9 · EMA BE guideline
For a drug product that is labelled to be taken only under fasting conditions or can be taken under fasting or fed conditions, i.e., without regard to food, a single BE study conducted under fasting conditions is recommended to demonstrate BE.ICH M13A · 2.1.5 ↗
For a drug product that is labelled to be taken only with food due to PK reasons, i.e., enhancing absorption or reducing variability, a single BE study conducted under fed conditions is recommended to demonstrate BE.ICH M13A · 2.1.5 ↗
For these high-risk products, BE studies should be conducted under both fasting and fed conditions, irrespective of the drug product labelling with regard to food intake, if safety permits.ICH M13A · 2.1.5 ↗
US FDA US Food and Drug Administration
M13A · M9 · ANDA BE · statistics · 21 CFR 320
For immediate-release drug products with a high risk of bioinequivalence due to food effect, FDA generally recommends that applicants conduct the following studies: (1) a single-dose, fasting BE study comparing the highest strength of the test product and reference standard; and (2) a single-dose, fed BE study comparing the highest strength of the test product and reference standard.FDA ANDA BE 2026 · IV.B.1 ↗
For a drug product that is labeled to be taken only with food due to PK reasons, i.e., enhancing absorption or reducing variability, a single BE study conducted under fed conditions is recommended to demonstrate BE.FDA M13A · 2.1.5 ↗
For all orally administered modified-release drug products, FDA recommends that applicants conduct BE studies under both fasting and fed conditions, irrespective of the RLD labeling regarding food intake.FDA ANDA BE 2026 · III.A.10 ↗
WHO World Health Organization
TRS 1052 Annex 8 (2024)
Fasted-state studies are generally preferred. However, when the product is known to cause gastrointestinal disturbances if given to subjects in the fasted state, or if the labelling of the comparator product restricts administration to subjects in the fed state, then a fed-state study becomes the preferred approach.WHO TRS 1052 Annex 8 · 7.4.4 — Immediate-release formulations ↗
For products with specific formulation characteristics (such as microemulsions or solid dispersions), bioequivalence studies performed under both fasted and fed conditions are required, unless the product is only taken in a fasted or fed state.WHO TRS 1052 Annex 8 · 7.4.4 — Immediate-release formulations ↗
Therefore, bioequivalence studies conducted under both fasted and fed conditions are required for orally administered, modified-release pharmaceutical products.WHO TRS 1052 Annex 8 · 7.1.4 ↗
Other questions in Bioequivalence & biowaivers
- When is an in vivo bioequivalence study required?
- What is the standard bioequivalence study design?
- How many subjects, and which population, are required in a bioequivalence study?
- Which reference (comparator) product must be used in a bioequivalence study?
- Which strength must be tested in a bioequivalence study?
- What should be measured in a bioequivalence study: parent drug, metabolite or enantiomers?
- What are the bioequivalence acceptance limits for AUC and Cmax (90% confidence interval)?
- What bioequivalence acceptance limits apply to narrow therapeutic index drugs?
- How are bioequivalence acceptance limits widened for highly variable drugs?
- When can additional strengths be waived from bioequivalence testing?
- When is a BCS-based biowaiver accepted?
- How is dissolution profile similarity (f2) assessed?
Excerpts are selected for comparison and are not the whole requirement; the binding text is each authority's current official document. Not regulatory advice.