Regulatory PathRegulatory requirements compared

SFDA item 61 · III. Safety, efficacy, pharmacovigilance changes

Change(s) to a PSMF following the assessment of the same change(s) to the same DDPS in relation to another medicinal product of the same MAH.

Variation category under SFDA, EU and US FDA rules for this change, with the variant wording as published.

Open in the Variation Compass

SFDA Saudi Food and Drug Authority

Guidelines for Variation Requirements v6.3 (DS-G-006), item 61 — official PDF, p. 69 ↗

VariantChangeType
-Change(s) to a PSMF following the assessment of the same change(s) to the same DDPS in relation to another medicinal product of the same MAH.Type IA

Conditions to be fulfilled and documentation to be supplied: see the official guideline, item 61.

EU European Union

Commission Guidelines C/2025/5045 — EUR-Lex ↗

C.8 · Introduction of a summary of pharmacovigilance system for medicinal products

VariantChangeType
aIntroduction of a summary of pharmacovigilance system after a change of the holderType IA(IN)

Note: Changes to the pharmacovigilance system master file are not variations in the EU; C.8 applies only to introducing a summary of the pharmacovigilance system after a change of holder.

US FDA US Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR 314.70 and FDA guidance — No US equivalent (21 CFR 314.80)

ChangeCategoryReference
No US equivalent: FDA has no PSMF filingNo US equivalent

Note: The US has no PSMF or QPPV filing; postmarketing safety reporting runs under 21 CFR 314.80 (NDA) and 314.98 (ANDA), so PV-system changes need no submission to the application.

Other items in III. Safety, efficacy, pharmacovigilance changes

Not regulatory advice. The binding text is each regulator's current official document; confirm the category with the authority before filing. FDA publishes no classification table: the US category follows FDA guidance or, where the guidance does not name the change, the closest example under 21 CFR 314.70.