Regulatory PathRegulatory requirements compared

SFDA item 68 · III. Safety, efficacy, pharmacovigilance changes

Introduction of a new Pharmacovigilance system

Variation category under SFDA, EU and US FDA rules for this change, with the variant wording as published.

Open in the Variation Compass

SFDA Saudi Food and Drug Authority

Guidelines for Variation Requirements v6.3 (DS-G-006), item 68 — official PDF, p. 71 ↗

VariantChangeType
aWhich has not been assessed by the relevant national competent authority for another product of the same MAHType II
bWhich has been assessed by the relevant national competent authority for another product of the same MAHType IB

Conditions to be fulfilled and documentation to be supplied: see the official guideline, item 68.

EU European Union

Commission Guidelines C/2025/5045 — EUR-Lex ↗

C.8 · Introduction of a summary of pharmacovigilance system for medicinal products

VariantChangeType
aIntroduction of a summary of pharmacovigilance system after a change of the holderType IA(IN)

Note: C.8(a) applies only to nationally authorised products after a change of holder; otherwise QPPV or PSMF-location changes are recorded in the Article 57 database, not by variation.

US FDA US Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR 314.70 and FDA guidance — No US equivalent (21 CFR 314.80)

ChangeCategoryReference
No US equivalent: no PV-system filing to varyNo US equivalent

Note: The US has no PSMF, QPPV or PV-system description in the application; postmarketing safety reporting under 21 CFR 314.80 (NDA) and 314.98 (ANDA) applies regardless, so a new PV system needs no submission.

Other items in III. Safety, efficacy, pharmacovigilance changes

Not regulatory advice. The binding text is each regulator's current official document; confirm the category with the authority before filing. FDA publishes no classification table: the US category follows FDA guidance or, where the guidance does not name the change, the closest example under 21 CFR 314.70.